MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980688572 · doi:10.1081/css-120014536

DETERMINATION OF TOTAL AND DISSOLVED PHOSPHORUS IN AGRICULTURAL RUNOFF SAMPLES BY INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA MASS SPECTROMETRY

2002· article· en· W1980688572 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alicia Cantarero, M. Belén López, J. Mahı́a, M.A. Maestro, Antônio Paz González

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryInductively coupled plasma mass spectrometryLeaching (pedology)Environmental chemistryDigestion (alchemy)Certified reference materialsFiltration (mathematics)Total dissolved solidsPhosphorusSample preparationInductively coupled plasmaChromatographyMass spectrometryDetection limitSoil waterEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leaching of nutrients to the drainage network is an important factor in polluting surface waters, with Phosphorus (P) often being the element of concern. Because P is strongly bound to sediments, different P fractions, including total, particulate and total dissolved P are now routinely measured. For the traditional determination of total P, a digestion followed by UV–Vis detection procedure was applied. The “true” total P content resulted from the digestion of a raw water sample containing suspended matter. Whereas the digestion performed to the sample after filtration through 0.45 μm membrane filter, gave the total dissolved P. The goal of this study was to measure the different fractions of P by ICP-MS. In the case of total P, no addition of coloring agents was necessary after the digestion process. Dissolved P was measured directly after filtration, without the previous digestion and no manipulation of the sample. Similar results were obtained by UV–Vis and by ICP-MS when measurements of demi water spiked with two different amounts of PO4 −3 were performed. Various agricultural runoff samples were digested with (NH4)2S2O8+H2SO4 30% (v/v) for total P determination. Again, similar results were obtained for both techniques. Three certified water samples from the Canadian National Water Research Institute were analyzed for dissolved P by ICP-MS. Beryllium and Sc were added as internal standards for possible drift corrections. Detection limits of 5 μg L−1 and linearity ranges from 10 μg L−1 to 5 mg L−1 were achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.325
Threshold uncertainty score0.294

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications in Soil Science and Plant AnalysisSame topicSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsFrench-language works237,207