Structure and membrane interactions of the β-amyloid fragment 25–35 as viewed using spectroscopic approaches
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The β-amyloid fragment peptide 25-35 (Aβ(25-35)) is recognized as the cytotoxic sequence of the parent peptide Aβ. However, it remains unclear whether its neurotoxicity originates from its fibrillar form, how it interacts with lipid membranes, and whether cholesterol modulates these interactions. These questions have been addressed at a molecular level using various microscopic and spectroscopic techniques. The data show that Aβ(25-35) forms protofilaments at pH 7.4 at a concentration of 5 mM in the absence and presence of DMPC/DMPG model membranes. The peptide adopts a predominant aggregated β-sheet conformation under these conditions. However, as the peptide concentration decreases, the β-sheet structure tends to disappear for the benefit of β-turns, suggesting that the peptide association is reversible. The β-sheet structure formed by Aβ(25-35) appears to be atypical and characterized by the absence of intermolecular dipolar coupling and by a parallel strand configuration. The data show that Aβ(25-35)-phospholipid interactions are characterized by an increase in the conformational order of the lipid acyl chains and a change in the fluidity/elasticity of the bilayers. Concomitantly, the peptide seems to lose a few β-sheet structures, which suggests that the interactions between Aβ(25-35) and DMPC/DMPG membranes are partly driven by peptide concentration. Interactions indeed seem to occur when part of the peptides is not involved in protofilaments and increase as the proportion of the free peptide species increases. The interactions are very similar in the presence of cholesterol, except that the concentration effect of Aβ(25-35) is cancelled, suggesting that Chol limits the penetration of the peptide inside the bilayers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".