Esophageal squamous papilloma in children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Esophageal squamous papilloma (ESP) is a rare and benign epithelial lesion occurring typically in adults aged 50 and over [ 1 ]. We report three children under 15 years who presented a single esophageal papilloma. For each patient, the lesion was asymptomatic, the patient had no history of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) or esophagitis, and the lesion was an incidental finding at esophagogastroduodenoscopy. The lesion appeared as a small sessile or pedunculated, mutilobulated, and verrucous polyp with fingerlike projections located in the mid or lower esophagus ([ Fig. 1 ]). Biopsies confirmed the diagnosis of papilloma, showing papillary projections of a fibrovascular core covered by squamous epithelium ([ Fig. 2 ]). There was no dysplasia, and human papillomavirus (HPV) infection could not be detected. Expression of p16INK4a, a marker for premalignant and malignant lesions of the squamous epithelia, was normal. The ESPs were removed with regular biopsy forceps. Endoscopy 6 months later in one patient showed no relapse. Fig. 1 Endoscopic views of an esophageal squamous papilloma (ESP): a ESP in the mid esophagus of a 15-year-old boy having esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for dyspepsia; b ESP in a 14-year-old girl having EGD for suspected celiac disease; c ESP in the lower esophagus of a 10-year-old boy with celiac disease. Fig. 2 Microscopic view of the papilloma. Papillary projections of tissue are lined by a stratified squamous epithelium and a fibrovascular core (hematoxylin and eosin, × 50). The etiology of ESP remains unclear. Chronic esophageal inflammation such as GER-induced esophagitis or direct trauma (caused, for example, by nasogastric tubes, dilations, or stents) may play a role [ 2 ] [ 3 ]. The role of HPV infection in the pathogenesis of ESP remains controversial: HPV is shown to be detected (by in-situ hybridization or polymerase chain reaction) in 0 % – 87 % of papillomatous tissue [ 2 ] [ 4 ]. Although HPV has been linked to pathogenesis of the larynx and cervical cancer, previous reports of isolated ESP did not identify any risk of progression to malignancies [ 5 ]. Furthermore, when found, HPV strains generally correspond to low-risk HPV genotypes [ 4 ]. Overexpression of the protein p16INK4a, involved in the regulation of the cell cycle and in cervical HPV-linked dysplasia, was not found in ESPs [ 4 ]. Since ESPs are extremely rare in children, there is no clear consensus regarding their management. However, ESP can be considered a benign lesion with uncommon recurrence. A solitary ESP < 10 mm should be removed with a regular biopsy forceps for histological study. Whether HPV and p16INK4a detection are useful in clinical practice remains unknown. Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_CCL_1AB_2AC_3AB
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".