Secondary structure of human apolipoprotein A‐I(1–186) in lipid‐mimetic solution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The solution structure of an apoA-I deletion mutant, apoA-I(1-186) was determined by the chemical shift index (CSI) method and the torsion angle likelihood obtained from shift and sequence similarity (TALOS) method, using heteronuclear multidimensional NMR spectra of [u-(13)C, u-(15)N, u-50% (2)H]apoA-I(1-186) in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). The backbone resonances were assigned from a combination of triple-resonance data (HNCO, HNCA, HN(CO)CA, HN(CA)CO and HN(COCA)HA), and intraresidue and sequential NOEs (three-dimensional (3D) and four-dimensional (4D) 13C- and 15N-edited NOESY). Analysis of the NOEs, H(alpha), C(alpha) and C' chemical shifts shows that apoA-I(1-186) in lipid-mimetic solution is composed of alpha-helices (which include the residues 8-32, 45-64, 67-77, 83-87, 90-97, 100-140, 146-162, and 166-181), interrupted by short irregular segments. There is one relatively long, irregular and mostly flexible region (residues 33-44), that separates the N-terminal domain (residues 1-32) from the main body of protein. In addition, we report, for the first time, the structure of the N-terminal domain of apoA-I in a lipid-mimetic environment. Its structure (alpha-helix 8-32 and flexible linker 33-44) would suggest that this domain is structurally, and possibly functionally, separated from the other part of the molecule.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".