Bibliographic record
Abstract
Trees were on Earth 394 million years ago (394 Ma) as spore-producing Archaeopteris progymnosperms having largediameter trunks of secondary xylem (morphotype Callixyon) produced by vascular cambium. Plants of smaller stature with primary xylem cores were present in Late Silurian (416 Ma), but they lacked cambium and it remains unclear how and when the first trees evolved. Progymnosperms faded and gymnosperms arose during Middle Carboniferous, and conifers, ginkgos, cycads, tree ferns and cordaites were well established by the Carboniferous–Permian transition (299 Ma). Woods of the earliest conifers were different from those of today, and not until Late Triassic (220 Ma) did any begin producing secondary xylem similar to modern woods, the xylem phenotypes of Cupressaceae and Araucariaceae emerging much earlier than those of Pinaceae and flowering plants. Conifers have persisted and done relatively well despite major extinction events, severe climate change, insectivory, herbivory and microbial activity, all of which were in effect before as well as during the appearance of trees on Earth. Approximately 600 conifer species continue to exist, and the survivors presumably possess the physiological fitness needed to adapt to an ever-changing biosphere. However, this is speculative because their physiology remains less than well understood. Forestry interventions such as planting one species to the exclusion of others have the potential to exacerbate as well as sustain the ongoing existence of our remaining conifers. Key words: bordered pit, cambium, cell biology, cellulose, evolution, lignin, paleobotany, protoplasmic autolysis, secondary growth, wood formation, xylogenesis
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".