MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981029565 · doi:10.2114/jpa2.25.91

Low Salivary Cortisol and Elevated Depressive Affect among Rural Men in Botswana: Reliability and Validity of Laboratory Results

2006· article· en· W1981029565 on OpenAlexaff
Seamus A. Decker

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of PHYSIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicStress Responses and Cortisol
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAffect (linguistics)PsychologyReliability (semiconductor)Clinical psychologyValidityDepressive symptomsDevelopmental psychologyPsychiatryPsychometricsAnxietyCommunication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most research on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function under aversive conditions has focused on relatively increased acute episodic, or chronic secretions as an operationalization of "stress." Severe or recurrent stress, perhaps in interaction with individual characteristics, results in chronically decreased HPA function among some persons suffering from posttraumatic stress disorder. Little evidence exists to assess the population distribution of chronic low cortisol in different free-ranging human populations, as a manifestation of past trauma or stress. This study reports findings of chronically depressed ambulatory salivary cortisol among rural-dwelling Batswana men (n=30) compared with men living in Gaborone (n=34), the capital of Botswana, based on repeated ambulatory sampling. Out of 914 saliva samples analyzed by radioimmunoassay, 268 (29.3%) samples (41 urban, 227 rural) were below the minimum detectable dose (<MDD of 0.034 ug/dL) of the assay. Low values were distributed across comparable times of day as were =MDD samples. There was significant clustering of low cortisol within individuals; percentage of intra-individual repeats that were <MDD ranged from zero to 94.1% for rural participants (median=59.8%; mean=54.8%; SD=27.8%), and from zero to 40% for urban (median=0%; mean=8%; SD=11.9%). There was no association between number of repeats and proportion <MDD (P[F=-0.47]=0.639; beta(1)=-0.0045+/-0.0019). Examination of laboratory quality control suggests that this pattern is not a result of measurement error, or poor sample preservation, but instead reflects a difference from residing in a remote rural versus a central urban community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.690
Threshold uncertainty score0.761

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of PHYSIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGYSame topicStress Responses and CortisolFrench-language works237,207