MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981047022 · doi:10.1061/9780784479117.008

Mechanical Properties of Structural Steel under Post-Impact Fire

2015· article· en· W1981047022 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStructures Congress 2015 · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFire effects on concrete materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersAustralian Research Council
KeywordsMaterials scienceUltimate tensile strengthStrain rateDuctility (Earth science)Structural engineeringDeformation (meteorology)Composite materialTensile testingStress (linguistics)Fire safetyMaterial propertiesDisplacement (psychology)Fire testCreepEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate prediction of material properties under combined high strain rate and elevated temperature are essential for safe design of structures to withstand post-impact fire situations such as collision by heavy vehicles followed by fire. Numerous material tests performed in recent years do not address the influence of such sequential loading on the mechanical properties of mild steel. An inclusive test program is carried out in the Civil Engineering Lab at Monash University to investigate the post-impact fire properties of Grade 350 structural steel and the results are presented here. Specimens have undergone interrupting high strain rate tensile loading, controlled locally at defined levels of elongation, to account for different deformation states. Different damage levels are introduced for each rate of strain with respect to the displacement corresponding to the ultimate stress (fu). Subsequently, the partly damaged specimens are subjected to static tensile loading to failure at high temperature conditions. Material behaviour of pre-damaged steel is compared to those of each individual loading scenario and to design code expressions. The test results demonstrate that the combined actions are profoundly different from that in which the structure is subjected to either high strain rate or thermal loading and notably vary from those predicted in different codes. Moreover, it is shown that the strength and ductility of mild steel are significantly dependent on the rate of loading, the pre-deformation history and the temperature it is subsequently exposed to. The experimental results can be used by researchers and structural engineers as benchmark data for calibrating current material model constants and/or developing new material models which take into account the coupled effect of high strain rate and temperature for rational fire analysis and design of steel structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it