MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981064303 · doi:10.1002/jlcr.465

Syntheses of the phosphodiesterase‐4 inhibitors [<sup>11</sup>C]Ro 20‐1724, R‐, R/S‐ and S‐[<sup>11</sup>C]rolipram

2001· article· en· W1981064303 on OpenAlexaff
Jean N. DaSilva, Célia Lourenço, Alan A. Wilson, Sylvain Houle

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhosphodiesterase function and regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryRolipramEnantiomerAlkylationPhosphodiesteraseIodideMethyl iodideHydrolysisHigh-performance liquid chromatographySpecific activityDesmethylStereochemistryEnzymeChromatographyMedicinal chemistryOrganic chemistryBiochemistryCatalysisMetabolite

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The high affinity and selective cAMP‐specific phosphodiesterase‐4 inhibitors Ro 20‐1724, R‐, R/S‐ and S‐rolipram were labeled with 11C by O‐[11C]methylation of their respective phenolic precursors using [11C]methyl iodide. The desmethyl precursor of Ro 20‐1724 was prepared by selective dealkylation with iodotrimethylsilane, whereas, dealkylation of racemic rolipram was not selective and yielded several products. Enantiomeric separation of R‐ and S‐desmethylrolipram was carried out by chiral semi‐preparative high performance liquid chromatography. The final 11C‐labeled products were prepared in high radiochemical purity (>99%), yields (45‐75%, decay‐corrected) and specific activities [18.5‐92.5 GBq/µmol], within 30 min from end‐of‐bombardment. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Labelled Compounds and RadiopharmaceuticalsSame topicPhosphodiesterase function and regulationFrench-language works237,207