MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981065242 · doi:10.1021/bi001095k

Characterization of an Alkaline Transition Intermediate Stabilized in the Phe82Trp Variant of Yeast<i>iso</i>-1-Cytochrome<i>c</i>

2000· article· en· W1981065242 on OpenAlexaff
Federico I. Rosell, Thomas R. Harris, Dean P. Hildebrand, Susanne Döpner, Peter Hildebrandt, A. Grant Mauk

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryHemeCytochrome cCytochromeYeastHemeproteinLigand (biochemistry)CrystallographyConformational isomerismHydroxideStereochemistryResidue (chemistry)BiochemistryEnzymeInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistryMoleculeReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In general, mutation of the phylogenetically conserved residue Phe82 in yeast iso-1-cytochrome c destabilizes the native conformation of the protein by facilitating the ligand exchange reactions that are associated with the alkaline conformational transitions of the ferricytochrome. Of the Phe82 variants surveyed thus far, Phe82Trp is unique in that it adopts a thermodynamically stable, high-spin conformation at mildly alkaline pH. This species exhibits spectroscopic features that can only be detected transiently in other ferricytochromes c within the first 100 ms immediately after a pH-jump from neutrality to pH >10. Spectroscopic characterization of this high-spin reaction intermediate suggests that in addition to an obligatory pentacoordinate heme iron, a group within the heme pocket coordinates the heme iron but is then replaced either by Met80, to revert to the native conformation, or by Lys73 or Lys79, to yield one of the conventional alkaline conformers. Evidence is presented to suggest that this group is either a hydroxide ion or Tyr67 rather than a loosely bound Met80.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.406

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistrySame topicPhotosynthetic Processes and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207