Molecular cytogenetic characterization of a derivative chromosome 8 with an inverted duplication of 8p21.3?p23.3 and a rearranged duplication of 8q24.13?qter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A derivative chromosome 8 was observed in a newborn boy who presented with low birth weight, multiple congenital anomalies, and dysmorphic face. The der(8) was further characterized at age 18 months by a high resolution G-banding analysis, spectral karyotyping, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with multiple DNA probes. The karyotype was described as 46,XY,der(8)(qter-->q24.13::p21.3-->p23.3::p23.3-->qter), representing an inverted duplication of region 8p21.3-->p23.3 and a duplication of region 8q24.13-->qter, which attaches to the duplicated short arm segment at 8p21.3. Different from previously reported patients with an inverted duplication (8p), no deletion was detected in the distal region of 8p in this case. This young child had manifested a broad nasal bridge, micrognathia, cleft lip, hydrocephalus, partial agenesis of the corpus callosum, Dandy-Walker malformation, congenital heart defects, dysplastic kidneys, hydronephrosis, marked hypotonia, and significant psychomotor retardation. These features are compared with those commonly seen in cases with an inverted duplication of 8p and cases with a partial trisomy of 8q.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".