MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981135805 · doi:10.1016/s0828-282x(08)70624-x

Reporting on sex-based analysis in clinical trials of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker efficacy

2008· review· en· W1981135805 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Doreen M. Rabi, Nadia Khan, Michel Vallée, Michelle Hladunewich, Sheldon W. Tobe, Louise Pilote

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Cardiology · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoMcGill University Health CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontCentre for Advancing Health OutcomesUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversité de MontréalUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineClinical trialRandomized controlled trialAngiotensin Receptor BlockersBlood pressureInternal medicineAngiotensin-converting enzymeAngiotensin receptorRenin–angiotensin systemPharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.058
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.191
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reporting · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.942
Threshold uncertainty score0.309

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0580.191
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0150.020
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.189
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
DomainReporting
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of CardiologySame topicBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesFrench-language works237,207