MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981150725 · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2004.09.070

Second transmembrane domain of human uncoupling protein 2 is essential for its anion channel formation

2004· article· en· W1981150725 on OpenAlexaff
Hiroshi Yamaguchi, Masoud Jelokhani‐Niaraki, Hiroaki Kodama

Bibliographic record

VenueFEBS Letters · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryIon channelTransmembrane proteinBiophysicsTransmembrane domainIon transporterIonBiochemistryMembraneBiologyReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Uncoupling proteins (UCP) are known to transport anions, such as Cl-, in addition to H+ transport. Although H+ transport by UCP is clearly involved in thermogenesis, the mechanism of its anion transport is not clearly understood. In this study, we examined the anion channel characteristics of the six individual helical transmembrane (TM) domains of the human UCP2. The second TM domain peptide (TM2) forms multi-state channels by assemblies of conductive oligomers. Furthermore, the TM2 exhibited voltage-dependent anion channels with properties comparable to those of UCP1 chloride channel. However, the other five TM peptides did not form UCP1-like channels. Moreover, an analog of TM2 in which two Arg residues were substituted by Ala residues did not form stable channels, implying the significance of Arg residues for anion transport. These results suggest that the anion channel structure of UCP2 protein is oligomeric and the second TM domain is essential for the voltage-dependence of this anion channel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEBS LettersSame topicAdipose Tissue and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207