MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981168027 · doi:10.1016/j.sexol.2013.09.001

Les préoccupations des parents à l’égard de la sexualité de leur enfant ayant une déficience intellectuelle légère

2013· article· fr· W1981168027 on OpenAlex
André Dupras, Hélène Dionne

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSexologies · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Medicine and Society
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologySociologyPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Des parents d’enfants ayant une déficience intellectuelle souhaitent participer à l’éducation sexuelle de leur progéniture. Seulement, ceux-ci estiment que cette tâche relève d’un défi difficile à accomplir efficacement. C’est pourquoi ce texte se penche sur les besoins en formation de dix parents d’élèves d’une école secondaire spécialisée en déficience intellectuelle légère. Lors d’une rencontre en groupe de discussion (focus group), les participants ont eu l’occasion d’exprimer leurs préoccupations face à la sexualité de leur enfant, mais aussi concernant leurs besoins en termes de soutien de manière à leur permettre d’être mieux à même d’assurer leur rôle d’éducateur à la sexualité. Les propos recueillis ont été analysés à partir d’une approche systémique permettant de mettre en lumière leurs besoins de formation à partir de la description de situations vécues dans le présent. Ressort principalement de cette rencontre que les parents perçoivent leur enfant comme un être vulnérable à qui il faut assurer une compétence sexuelle lui permettant de savoir comment agir dans des situations à caractère sexuel. Une analyse critique des besoins des parents interroge leurs intentions éducatives afin de proposer une formation qui articule des objectifs pragmatiques avec des objectifs humanistes. Parents of children with an intellectual disability want to participate in the sexuality education of their offspring. Yet, they believe that this task is a difficult challenge to accomplish effectively. That is why this text focuses on the training needs of ten parents of students from a high school that specializes in mild intellectual disability. During a focus group meeting, participants had the opportunity to express their concerns about their children's sexuality but also about their own needs in terms of support to enable them to be better at fulfilling their role as sexuality educators. The comments received were analyzed using a systemic approach to highlight their training needs based on the description of current situations. The main outcome of this meeting is that parents perceive their children as vulnerable beings that must ensure sexual competence to know how to act in sexual situations. A critical analysis of parents’ needs questions their educational intentions in order to provide training that focuses on pragmatic goals with humanistic goals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it