Les préoccupations des parents à l’égard de la sexualité de leur enfant ayant une déficience intellectuelle légère
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Des parents d’enfants ayant une déficience intellectuelle souhaitent participer à l’éducation sexuelle de leur progéniture. Seulement, ceux-ci estiment que cette tâche relève d’un défi difficile à accomplir efficacement. C’est pourquoi ce texte se penche sur les besoins en formation de dix parents d’élèves d’une école secondaire spécialisée en déficience intellectuelle légère. Lors d’une rencontre en groupe de discussion (focus group), les participants ont eu l’occasion d’exprimer leurs préoccupations face à la sexualité de leur enfant, mais aussi concernant leurs besoins en termes de soutien de manière à leur permettre d’être mieux à même d’assurer leur rôle d’éducateur à la sexualité. Les propos recueillis ont été analysés à partir d’une approche systémique permettant de mettre en lumière leurs besoins de formation à partir de la description de situations vécues dans le présent. Ressort principalement de cette rencontre que les parents perçoivent leur enfant comme un être vulnérable à qui il faut assurer une compétence sexuelle lui permettant de savoir comment agir dans des situations à caractère sexuel. Une analyse critique des besoins des parents interroge leurs intentions éducatives afin de proposer une formation qui articule des objectifs pragmatiques avec des objectifs humanistes. Parents of children with an intellectual disability want to participate in the sexuality education of their offspring. Yet, they believe that this task is a difficult challenge to accomplish effectively. That is why this text focuses on the training needs of ten parents of students from a high school that specializes in mild intellectual disability. During a focus group meeting, participants had the opportunity to express their concerns about their children's sexuality but also about their own needs in terms of support to enable them to be better at fulfilling their role as sexuality educators. The comments received were analyzed using a systemic approach to highlight their training needs based on the description of current situations. The main outcome of this meeting is that parents perceive their children as vulnerable beings that must ensure sexual competence to know how to act in sexual situations. A critical analysis of parents’ needs questions their educational intentions in order to provide training that focuses on pragmatic goals with humanistic goals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".