C-fiber spontaneous discharge evoked by chronic inflammation is suppressed by a long-term infusion of lidocaine yielding nanogram per milliliter plasma levels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nociceptors innervating inflamed tissue acquire an abnormal spontaneous discharge that is believed to be at least part of the reason for the persistent spontaneous pain, allodynia, and hyperalgesia that accompany inflammation. Recent studies suggest that patients with chronic inflammatory pain may obtain an analgesic effect with transdermal application of lidocaine that yields very low plasma levels (130-225 ng/ml). The aim of this study was to investigate whether a 7-day exposure to such low plasma levels of lidocaine had an effect on inflammation-evoked spontaneous discharge in the rat. Seven days after a hind-paw injection of Complete Freund's Adjuvant (CFA), we confirmed the presence of myositis, pain hypersensitivity, and a significant increase in the incidence of spontaneous discharge in A-fibers and C-fibers innervating both muscle and skin. We then compared the incidence of spontaneous discharge in muscle and cutaneous fibers in CFA-injected animals treated with a 7-day infusion of saline or lidocaine. The lidocaine infusion yielded a plasma level of 210 ng/ml. The muscle C-fiber discharge was completely inhibited by the lidocaine infusion and the cutaneous C-fiber discharge was suppressed by 50%. Lidocaine infusion had no effect on the incidence of spontaneous discharge in muscle or cutaneous A-fibers. Lidocaine infusion reduced mechano-hyperalgesia but had no effect on mechano-allodynia or heat-hyperalgesia. We conclude that the analgesic effects seen clinically with transdermal lidocaine administration yielding low plasma levels may be due to a systemic drug action on spontaneously active C-fibers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".