Large-Scale Asset Renewal Optimization Using Genetic Algorithms plus Segmentation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Civil infrastructure assets require continuous renewal actions to modernize inventory and sustain operability. However, allocating limited renewal funds among numerous asset components represents a complex optimization problem. Earlier efforts using genetic algorithms (GAs) optimized medium-sized problems, yet exhibited steep performance degradation as problem size increased. In this research, data compression is first used to cluster and abstract the large data of a network-level problem. Optimizing compressed models, however, did not result in high quality solutions. To address large size problems, a GA with segmentation approach was introduced. Segmentation breaks down a large-scale network-level problem into segments, allocates budget based on the relative criticality of the segment, and combines the results of all segment optimizations. The proposed GA with segmentation mechanism has been tested on different sized problems and was able to optimize very large problems with no performance degradation. The proposed GA with segmentation method is simple and logical; furthermore, it can be used on variety of asset types to improve fund allocation for infrastructure renewal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it