MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Low‐temperature modulation of the redox properties of the acceptor side of photosystem II: photoprotection through reaction centre quenching of excess energy

2003· article· en· W1981197500 on OpenAlexafffund
Alexander G. Ivanov, P. V. Sane, Vaughan Hurry, Marianna Król, Dimitry Sveshnikov, Norman P. A. Hüner, Gunnar Öquist

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiologia Plantarum · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaVetenskapsrådet
KeywordsPhotosystem IIP680RedoxPhotochemistryQuenching (fluorescence)PhotoprotectionPhotosynthetic reaction centreChemistryPhotoinhibitionPhotosynthesisPlastoquinoneElectron acceptorElectron transport chainPopulationElectron transferBiophysicsPhotosystem IBiologyChloroplastBiochemistryFluorescencePhysicsInorganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although it has been well established that acclimation to low growth temperatures is strongly correlated with an increased proportion of reduced Q A in all photosynthetic groups, the precise mechanism controlling the redox state of Q A and its physiological significance in developing cold tolerance in photoautotrophs has not been fully elucidated. Our recent thermoluminescence (TL) measurements of the acceptor site of PSII have revealed that short‐term exposure of the cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. PCC 7942 to cold stress, overwintering of Scots pine ( Pinus sylvestris L.), and acclimation of Arabidopsis plants to low growth temperatures, all caused a substantial shift in the characteristic T M of S 2 Q B – recombination to lower temperatures. These changes were accompanied by much lower overall TL emission, restricted electron transfer between Q A and Q B , and in Arabidopsis by a shift of the S 2 Q A – ‐related peak to higher temperatures. The shifts in recombination temperatures are indicative of a lower activation energy for the S 2 Q B – redox pair and a higher activation energy for the S 2 Q A – redox pair. This results in an increase in the free‐energy gap between P680 + Q A – and P680 + Pheo – and a narrowing of the free energy gap between Q A and Q B electron acceptors. We propose that these effects result in an increased population of reduced Q A (Q A – ), facilitating non‐radiative P680 + Q A – radical pair recombination within the PSII reaction centre. The proposed reaction centre quenching could be an important protective mechanism in cyanobacteria in which antenna and zeaxanthin cycle‐dependent quenching are not present. In herbaceous plants, the enhanced capacity for dissipation of excess light energy via PSII reaction centre quenching following cold acclimation may complement their capacity for increased utilization of absorbed light through CO 2 assimilation and carbon metabolism. During overwintering of evergreens, when photosynthesis is inhibited, PSII reaction centre quenching may complement non‐photochemical quenching within the light‐harvesting antenna when zeaxanthin cycle‐dependent energy quenching is thermodynamically restricted by low temperatures. We suggest that PSII reaction centre quenching is a significant mechanism enabling cold‐acclimated organisms to acquire increased resistance to high light.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.309

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologia PlantarumSame topicPhotosynthetic Processes and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207