MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981198613 · doi:10.1149/05801.1701ecst

Phenylenediamine as a Promising Ligand for Non-Noble Metal ORR Catalysts

2013· article· en· W1981198613 on OpenAlexafffund
Samar A. Gharaibeh, Viola Birss

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCatalysisLigand (biochemistry)Noble metalPyrolysisCarbon fibersMonomerRing (chemistry)CathodeMetalChemistryRotating ring-disk electrodeElectrocatalystElectrodeChemical engineeringCombinatorial chemistryPolymer chemistryMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistryElectrochemistryPolymerComposite numberComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper compares the use of o-phenylenediamine (oPDA) and its polymeric counterpart, poly-o-phenylenediamine (PoPDA), as the ligand precursors for the formation of non-precious metal (NPM, Co vs. Fe) cathode catalysts. Rotating ring disk electrode (RRDE) work revealed that high onset potentials (0.92 V vs. RHE) and low %H 2 O 2 yields (0.5 % over a wide potential range of 0.05-0.7 V) can be obtained. The use of PoPDA proved to be a better C-N source than the o-PDA monomer, likely due to the formation of a higher number of active sites or to the improved stability of these active sites on the carbon support during high temperature pyrolysis. In all cases, the Fe-based catalyst is superior to the Co-based one. Also, this study confirms the additional benefits of using acid-leached vs. as-received carbon as the support material.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.177
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFrench-language works237,207