Potential for Desiccation of Geosynthetic Clay Liners Used in Barrier Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The potential for the desiccation of a geosynthetic clay liner (GCL) forming part of a single composite landfill liner is evaluated. A thermohydromechanical model is used to identify conditions likely to cause desiccation. Simulations for typical landfill conditions show that the potential risk of desiccation exists even at relatively low temperatures (i.e., 35°C). It is found that the water content of the GCL prior to waste placement, the liner temperature, the overburden stress, the grain size and water content of the subsoil, and the depth to aquifer all affect the potential for desiccation. The results suggest that the placement of GCLs directly over coarse-grained soils or drainage layers should be evaluated carefully. This study highlights the need for more research into the potential for GCL desiccation and, in particular, the need to establish water retention curves for different GCLs over a range of stresses and degrees of hydration before heating, so that the effect of stress and hysteresis on the potential for desiccation can be examined. The findings of this study are limited by the approximations and assumptions described in the paper and, even then, apply only to the GCL and conditions examined. Changing the assumptions may change the findings. The findings should not be generalized to other composite liners without independent verification. The results serve to identify some of the situations that may lead to GCL desiccation, and it is hoped that they will prompt more research on this important topic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".