MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981300070 · doi:10.1080/00984100290071270

TRIBUTYLTIN INDUCES HUMAN NEUTROPHIL APOPTOSIS AND SELECTIVE DEGRADATION OF CYTOSKELETAL PROTEINS BY CASPASES

2002· article· en· W1981300070 on OpenAlexaff
Valérie Lavastre, Denis Girard

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Toxicology and Environmental Health · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMarine Biology and Environmental Chemistry
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVinculinGelsolinCell biologyTributyltinApoptosisPaxillinCytoskeletonVimentinChemistryCaspaseBiologyMolecular biologyBiochemistryProgrammed cell deathImmunologyFocal adhesionActinCellSignal transduction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tributyltin (TBT) has frequently been used as a pesticide and in biocidal paints for marine vessels, leading to its presence in the environment. Although TBT was recently found to induce apoptosis in different immune cells, by a mechanism that is not fully established, its effect on neutrophils is not known. In this study, it was found that TBT induced apoptosis in human neutrophils as assessed by cytology, flow cytometry, and degradation of the microfilament-associated protein gelsolin. Furthermore, data showed that TBT induced neutrophil apoptosis by a caspase-dependent mechanism, since addition of z-Val-Ala-Asp(MOe)-CH(2)F (z-VAD-FMK) in the culture prevented the effect of TBT. It was also found that the cytoskeletal proteins gelsolin, paxillin, and vimentin, but not vinculin, were degraded by TBT via caspases, as assessed by immunoblotting. Data indicate that gelsolin, paxillin, and vimentin are three caspase substrates involved in both spontaneous and TBT-induced neutrophil apoptosis. Cells were not necrotic as assessed by trypan blue dye exclusion, and this is in agreement with the absence of vinculin degradation. Evidence indicates that TBT-induced fragmentation of cytoskeletal proteins via caspases is a process that is tightly regulated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.151
Threshold uncertainty score0.445

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Toxicology and Environmental HealthSame topicMarine Biology and Environmental ChemistryFrench-language works237,207