Food stress, nestling growth, and fluctuating asymmetry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It has been suggested that fluctuating asymmetry (FA) is an indicator of perturbed development. Our study tests the validity of a fundamental assumption of asymmetry theory: that environmental stress imposed during development increases FA. We deprived tree swallow (Tachycineta bicolor) nestlings of food for 3 h every morning from days 3 to 15 of brood age. We obtained 2 repeated measurements of the right and left ninth primaries, outer rectrices, and tarsi, and one measure of body mass on days 8, 12, and 16. Food-deprived nestlings had significantly smaller character sizes (all characters for all days), significantly lower wing and tail feather growth rates, and significantly higher tarsal and mass growth rates than control nestlings. However, food deprivation did not cause experimental nestlings to exhibit significantly greater FA than control nestlings. Nestling mass and FA were not associated within treatments or across broods, and brood size had no significant effect upon the character size, growth rate, or FA level in nestlings. Measurement errors were small and size scaling, antisymmetry, and directional asymmetry did not confound FA estimates. Our results suggest that the ninth primaries and outer rectrices of tree swallows are unreliable indicators of FA-stress relations because of strong stabilizing selection for symmetry in this aerially insectivorous species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".