MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981334361 · doi:10.1086/508543

The Power of Plagues By Irwin W. Sherman Washington, DC: ASM Press, 2006. 442 pp., illustrated. $39.95 (cloth)

2006· article· en· W1981334361 on OpenAlex
G. P. Wormser, Karen McClean

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Infectious Diseases · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEnvironmental, Ecological, and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanRoyal University Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePower (physics)Gerontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Power of Plagues is a nicely presented volume with 400-plus pages of text, enhanced by numerous black and white images, that describe how plagues have shaped human history. A topical (rather than chronological) approach is used to explore key plagues from ancient to modern times. In addition to discussing plagues caused by infectious diseases, the author devotes 1 chapter to plagues that resulted from micronutrient deficiencies. The author describes the 3 objectives of this text: “to place infectious disease in a historical context,” “to describe the nature and evolution of diseases,” and “to show how the past could prepare us for future encounters with infectious diseases” (p. viii).The strength of this book lies in the historical descriptions of disease outbreaks and, in particular, in the discussions of societal responses to disease and the social upheaval that frequently accompanied dramatic outbreaks of disease. In terms of describing the nature and evolution of diseases (the author's second major objective), this text is disappointing. Exploration of the causes of outbreaks and changing disease incidence are largely one dimensional, focusing on a single factor and ignoring other significant contributing factors. The complex interplay of environment, microbe, host, and society in the emergence of plagues is not explored, nor is there an explicit recognition of the multifactorial nature of disease emergence. Inaccuracies and imprecise wording that is prone to misinterpretation mar discussions of disease features and pathogenesis. A number of interpretations are counter to conventional wisdom and are provided without supporting discussion or recognition of more traditional explanations. For instance, the Cyprian plague, which is conventionally considered to be caused by either measles or smallpox, is attributed to ergotism. Inconsistent with the attribution to ergotism is the accompanying statement that the disease spread quickly through person-to-person contact and contaminated clothing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it