Entrapment of Flaxseed Oil Within Gelatin‐Gum Arabic Capsules
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The aim of this study was to optimize the encapsulation of flaxseed oil within a gelatin‐gum Arabic (GA) matrix via complex coacervation. The effect of homogenization rates (3,000–15,000 rpm) and total biopolymer concentrations (1–2% w/v) on emulsion efficiency was studied in order to optimize the wall matrix. The physicochemical properties of the dried powder, and the capsule's ability to inhibit oxidation during storage were assessed. As homogenization rates increased from 3,000 to 9,000 rpm, the structure of the capsule transitioned from a spherical mononuclear‐type to irregular‐shaped multinuclear capsules. The size of the capsules and amount of non‐encapsulated oil was found to increase as the total biopolymer concentration was raised from 1 to 2% (w/v). Subsequently, gelatin‐GA capsules were produced with a 1:1 core‐to‐wall ratio at a total biopolymer concentration of 2% (w/v) and at a homogenization rate of 9,000 rpm. Formed capsules had an encapsulation efficiency of 84% and showed a protective effect against the production of primary and secondary oxidative products versus non‐encapsulated oil during 25 days of room temperature storage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".