MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981407443 · doi:10.2106/jbjs.h.01596

Assessment of the Posterior Ligamentous Complex Following Acute Cervical Spine Trauma

2010· article· en· W1981407443 on OpenAlexaff
Jeffrey A. Rihn, Charles G. Fisher, James S. Harrop, William B. Morrison, Nuo Yang, Alexander R. Vaccaro

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Canadian institutionsVancouver General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetic resonance imagingMedicineFacet (psychology)RadiologyNuclear medicineKappaCervical spineLigamentous laxityFasciaAnatomySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging is commonly used to assess the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex following cervical trauma, but its accuracy and reliability have not been documented, to our knowledge. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting injury to specific components of the posterior ligamentous complex of the cervical spine. METHODS: Patients with an acute cervical spine injury that required posterior surgical treatment were prospectively studied. The six components of the posterior ligamentous complex were characterized as intact, incompletely disrupted, or disrupted on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging studies by a radiologist and intraoperatively by two surgeons. Correlation between the magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative findings was determined. The percent agreement, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging as a tool for characterizing the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex were calculated. RESULTS: Forty-seven consecutive patients with a total of seventy levels of injury were studied. Overall, there was moderate agreement between the magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative findings for the supraspinous and interspinous ligaments (kappa scores of 0.46 and 0.43, respectively) and fair agreement between those for the ligamentum flavum, left and right facet capsules, and cervical fascia (kappa scores of 0.32, 0.31, 0.26, and 0.39, respectively). The sensitivity of the magnetic resonance imaging was greatest for the cervical fascia (100%) and the lowest for the facet capsules (80%). Specificity ranged from 56% (for the facet capsules) to 67% (for the interspinous ligament). The positive predictive value ranged from 42% (for the cervical fascia) to 82% (for the interspinous ligament). CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance imaging is sensitive for the evaluation of injury to the posterior ligamentous complex in the setting of acute cervical trauma. However, it has a lower positive predictive value and specificity, suggesting that injury to the posterior ligamentous complex may be "over-read" on magnetic resonance images. If magnetic resonance imaging is used in isolation to guide treatment, the high rate of false-positive findings may lead to unnecessary surgery. Other factors, including the morphology of the injury and the neurological status, should be considered as well when devising a treatment plan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.801
Threshold uncertainty score0.266

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Bone and Joint SurgerySame topicCervical and Thoracic MyelopathyFrench-language works237,207