MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1981429430 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.tim2013-b12

Abstract B12: The role of stromal cells in supporting tumor-initiating cells in serous ovarian carcinoma

2013· article· en· W1981429430 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Hussain, Jocelyn M. Stewart, Elzbieta Hyatt, Benjamin G. Neel, Laurie Ailles

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Cells and Metastasis
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCD90Stromal cellVimentinTumor microenvironmentMesenchymal stem cellCancer researchSerous fluidImmunostainingBiologyPopulationPathologyCD44CellMedicineImmunohistochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract High grade serous ovarian carcinoma has been shown to be a highly heterogeneous disease. In vivo studies demonstrate that the tumor initiating frequency (TIF) varies substantially from case to case. Nonetheless, the tumor initiating subset remains a rare population within the epithelial compartment and can be enriched using the cell surface marker CD133 (Stewart et al., PNAS, 2011). The tumor microenvironment may play a role in supporting and maintaining tumor initiating cells (TIC) through direct and/ or indirect cross talk. The contribution of the mesenchymal component of the microenvironment may prove to be essential in providing such support as has been previously shown in studies on breast and prostate cancers. We hypothesize that cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs) serve as a niche that supports and maintains the tumorigenic potential of TICs in SOC. We have derived and established CAF lines from bulk primary tumors and characterized their phenotype through immunostaining. Those lines stained positive for mesenchymal markers (Vimentin and Alpha-SMA), and stained negative for the epithelial marker Cytokertain. A profile of surface markers expressed on the surface of these CAF lines was then generated by running a flow cytometry-based high throughput screen (HTS) for 370 known cell surface proteins. Those markers are being validated for their specificity by immunostaining, FACS, qPCR, and in vivo work. Preliminary data obtained through immunoflourescnce and FACS support the specificity of our candidate stromal marker CD90. Furthermore, FACS data show that CD90 is expressed more brightly on fibroblasts than on epithelial cells (EpCAM+) in bulk SOC cases. Consequently, CD90 has been selected for sorting stromal cells for additional validation. Quantitative PCR analysis of CD90+EpCAM- sorted populations further validates their over-expression of mesenchymal genes when compared to CD90-EpCAM+ sorted populations. Moreover, functional validation of the influence of fibroblasts on the growth of tumor cells is currently being investigated through co-injection and co-culture assays. Preliminary data show that the presence of fibroblasts better supports the growth of epithelial colonies in culture than when compared to other conditions. Interplay between the niche and a specific subset of epithelial cells may promote those cells to become more tumorigenic. Such an interaction may be dependent on direct physical contact and/or indirect cross talk. Ultimately, we aim on understanding the mechanisms that govern these interactions. Citation Format: Ali Hussain, Jocelyn Stewart, Elzbieta Hyatt, Benjamin Neel, Laurie Ailles. The role of stromal cells in supporting tumor-initiating cells in serous ovarian carcinoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Tumor Invasion and Metastasis; Jan 20-23, 2013; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(3 Suppl):Abstract nr B12.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCancer Cells and Metastasis→French-language works237,207→