MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981463230 · doi:10.1115/gt2011-45147

Combustion Emission Measurements With Preheated Jet Fuel

2011· article· en· W1981463230 on OpenAlexafffund
Qing-ping Zheng, Sean Yun, Dan Titirica, Sam Sampath, Ibrahim Yimer

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 2: Combustion, Fuels and Emissions, Parts A and B · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAdvanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
FundersGovernment of Canada
KeywordsCombustorCombustionNOxNuclear engineeringEnvironmental scienceFuel injectionJet fuelAutomotive engineeringMaterials scienceWaste managementEngineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Jet fuel thermal stability at high temperature is receiving increased attention recently as advanced aero engines are being pushed to high power, high pressure and temperature regimes for improved engine cycle performance and low emissions. This paper describes the rig experimental tests to assess the high fuel temperature effect on combustor emissions. A special test rig facility has been designed and set up for emission measurements with preheated fuel. The purpose of the tests is to evaluate the combustor emission characteristics under nominal and elevated fuel temperatures. The scope of the project is two fold: (1) to design, procure and establish a dedicated hot fuel deoxygenation, fuel preheat facility that can reach temperature up to 600 °F (589 K); (2) to measure combustion emissions, mainly NOx, CO and UHC, at normal and elevated fuel temperature under representative engine operating conditions. The test rig has run for extended duration and proved reliable over the whole test campaign. Measured emission results show that fuel temperature effect on NOx, CO, UHC emissions are marginal, possibly due to the low emission capability of the sector combustor that is less sensitive to fuel inlet condition changes than other combustor designs. These results indicate a manageable risk for engine development with elevated fuel temperature from the emission viewpoint.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.817

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVolume 2: Combustion, Fuels and Emissions, Parts A and BSame topicAdvanced Aircraft Design and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207