MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981484881 · doi:10.1080/10428190601078605

HLA-DR protein status predicts survival in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated on the MACOP-B chemotherapy regimen

2007· article· en· W1981484881 on OpenAlexaff
Lisa M. Rimsza, Pedro Farinha, Deborah Fuchs, Hamid Masoudi, Joseph M. Connors, Randy D. Gascoyne

Bibliographic record

VenueLeukemia & lymphoma/Leukemia and lymphoma · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer AgencyUniversity of British Columbia
FundersAmerican Cancer Society
KeywordsRegimenMedicineInternal medicineInternational Prognostic IndexDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaProportional hazards modelLymphomaHuman leukocyte antigenChemotherapyChemotherapy regimenOncologyRituximabGastroenterologyAntigenImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Loss of major histocompatibility class II (MHC class II) molecules on diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has been associated with poor survival; however, none of these reports analysed a uniformly treated patient cohort. This study was designed to validate one MHC class II antigen, HLA-DR, as a prognostic marker in patients uniformly treated with the MACOP-B regimen. Immunostaining results were correlated with the international prognostic index (IPI) score and overall survival (OS). Of the 97 cases, 82 had interpretable staining. Of these, 52 expressed HLA-DR (median OS, 16.2 years) while 30 were negative (median OS, 4.2 years, P = 0.037). The IPI was also predictive of OS in the study group (P = 0.023). A Cox multivariate model established both IPI (P = 0.031) and HLA-DR (P = 0.04) as independent predictors of OS. This is the first demonstration of the prognostic relevance of HLA-DR in a uniformly treated DLBCL patient group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLeukemia & lymphoma/Leukemia and lymphomaSame topicLymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207