Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clinical Eye Atlas Daniel H. Gold, MD, and Richard Alan Lewis, MD, MS. American Medical Association Press, Chicago, 2002. ISBN: 1-57947-192-7. Price: $129.95 Scope: This is a 1464-page, multiauthored atlas and textbook intended for all eye-care specialists. Contents: The book is divided into fourteen sections, covering all areas of ophthalmology. The organization of the book is very reader-friendly, including the index. Section editors are renowned in their areas and have assembled several contributing authors for their respective sections. There is very little repetition across sections, as one might fear in a book with over 50 contributors. Editors have done an exceptional job of collecting clinical photographs to augment their text. In addition, many histologic photographs are included to provide meaningful clinicopathologic correlation. Almost every conceivable ocular condition is discussed, and in keeping with the title of the book, a representative color photograph is provided for each discussion. The quality of the color reproductions is generally good. All conditions are summarized under the following headings: clinical features, basics, diagnosis, and management. Most atlases do not include such detail, which makes this atlas unique. Strengths: This atlas is one of the best ophthalmic atlases that I have seen. It is well written, well organized, and wonderfully illustrated. In addition, it is comprehensive and user-friendly. Weaknesses: There were no significant critical weaknesses to be noted here, aside from a handful of photographs (less than 10) that were too dark to discern details. Recommended audience: The editors have succeeded in reaching their intended audience—all of us. Every eye-care professional will benefit by having a copy of this atlas, especially the junior and “on-call” ophthalmology resident. Critical appraisal: Daniel Gold and Richard Alan Lewis are well-respected clinicians. They have done an exceptional job and are to be commended for their work here. One cannot help but be impressed by the monumental task of collecting so many photographs spanning such breadth; given that ophthalmology is such a visually oriented specialty, a comprehensive atlas of this quality is a must for all clinicians.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".