MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981527457 · doi:10.1109/ccnc.2014.6940503

Green networking strategies for distributed computing

2014· article· en· W1981527457 on OpenAlexaff
Ala Shaabana, Fangyun Luo, Ying Chen, Arunita Jaekel

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Optical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEnergy consumptionComputer networkOverhead (engineering)Bandwidth (computing)Distributed computingWavelength-division multiplexingHeuristicEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The high bandwidth and speed of wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) optical networks are allowing efficient use of distributed computing and storage resources that would not have been feasible earlier. There has been much focus, in recent years, on the development of “green” techniques that reduce the energy consumption of the computing and storage facilities at the network nodes. However, a significant amount of energy overhead is also incurred in the process of transmitting large amounts of data over the network. This includes energy consumption of various network components such as routers, switches, in-line amplifiers and transponders. In this paper, we focus on energy minimization techniques for high-speed communication over an optical network. Given a set of communication requests, along with the bandwidth needs, and specified start and end times for each request, we propose a new approach that exploits knowledge of demand holding times to intelligently share resources among non-overlapping demands and reduce the overall power consumption of the network. We first present a simple shortest path heuristic that significantly outperforms traditional holding time unaware (HTU) approaches. We then present a novel Genetic Algorithm (GA) based strategy that jointly minimizes both power consumption and transceiver cost for the network and achieves additional energy savings, even compared to our first approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.859
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Optical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207