MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981590416 · doi:10.1021/cg050489d

Pseudopolymorphism of Ethylpyrogall[6]arene:  Investigating the Role of Solvent in Guiding Self-Assembly of 3D Networks

2006· article· en· W1981590416 on OpenAlexaff
Philip O. Brown, G.D. Enright, John A. Ripmeester

Bibliographic record

VenueCrystal Growth & Design · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSupramolecular Chemistry and Complexes
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityNational Research Council CanadaSteacie Institute for Molecular Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryRandom hexamerAcetoneRecrystallization (geology)TetramerCrystallographyMagic angle spinningPowder diffractionSolventNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyStereochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent studies have demonstrated that the r- tctct isomer of ethylpyrogall[6]arene (6EPGR) can be readily isolated as a minor product of the synthesis of the corresponding tetramer in the form of a 6 DMSO/1 6EPGR clathrate in the hexagonal space group R -3. Simultaneous studies in our group have led to the isolation of said hexamer as a 12 DMSO/1 6EPGR clathrate in the same space group. Using powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) and 13 C cross polarization magic angle spinning (CP/MAS) NMR spectroscopy, we have demonstrated that this 12 DMSO/1 6EPGR pseudopolymorph is, in fact, the precursor to the 6 DMSO/1 6EPGR form. The 6 DMSO/1 6EPGR form can be obtained through simple heating of this 12 DMSO/1 6EPGR precursor, as well as recrystallization of the precursor from acetone. Furthermore, in light of the data we have obtained using these techniques, in conjunction with direct observation of the process using a microscope, we suggest that the 6:1 inclusion as prepared by recrystallization from acetone is more appropriately modeled as containing acetone in addition to DMSO and comment on the relationship between these pseudopolymorphic forms and the impacts of the two methods of conversion on the structures of the clathrates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.848

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCrystal Growth & DesignSame topicSupramolecular Chemistry and ComplexesFrench-language works237,207