MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981621686 · doi:10.12968/npre.2013.11.2.70

An update on hypertension for nurse prescribers

2013· article· en· W1981621686 on OpenAlexaff
Helen Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueNurse Prescribing · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Canadian institutionsOntario Stroke Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAmbulatory blood pressureNiceAngiotensin Receptor BlockersBlood pressureIntensive care medicineExcellenceMasked HypertensionInternal medicineAngiotensin-converting enzymeCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2011, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance for hypertension endorsed the use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) for the diagnosis of hypertension. When ABPM is not available, home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is preferred over clinic blood pressure readings. The diagnostic threshold for hypertension using ABPM or HBPM is any blood pressure of 135/85 mmHg or higher. Once diagnosed, patients should be offered lifestyle advice, and, if appropriate, drug therapies, aiming to control blood pressure to lower than 140/90 mmHg. A revised treatment algorithm recommends angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers or calcium channel blockers as first- and second-line therapy options. Ensuring appropriate ongoing monitoring as well as identifying and addressing non-adherence are key issues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNurse PrescribingSame topicBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesFrench-language works237,207