MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981642316 · doi:10.1002/iub.194

Nuclear localization signals and human disease

2009· review· en· W1981642316 on OpenAlexaff
Laura M. McLane, Anita H. Corbett

Bibliographic record

VenueIUBMB Life · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicNuclear Structure and Function
Canadian institutionsTellabs (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNuclear transportNuclear poreNucleoporinCell biologyCytoplasmTransport proteinNucleusCompartment (ship)Nuclear export signalRanNuclear proteinProtein targetingBiologyCell nucleusImportinNuclear localization sequenceNuclear laminaGeneticsMembrane proteinGeneTranscription factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In eukaryotic cells, the physical separation of the genetic material in the nucleus from the translation and signaling machinery in the cytoplasm by the nuclear envelope creates a requirement for a mechanism through which macromolecules can enter or exit the nucleus as necessary. Nucleocytoplasmic transport involves the specific recognition of cargo molecules by transport receptors in one compartment followed by the physical relocation of that cargo into the other compartment through regulated pores that perforate the nuclear envelope. The recognition of protein cargoes by their transport receptors occurs via amino acid sequences in cargo proteins called nuclear targeting signals. Both nuclear import and export of proteins are highly regulated processes that control, not only what cargo can enter and/or exit the nucleus, but also when in the cell cycle and in what cell type, the cargo can be transported. Deregulation of the nuclear transport of specific cargoes has been linked to numerous cancers and developmental disorders highlighting the importance of understanding the mechanisms underlying nucleocytoplasmic transport and particularly the modulation of the specific interactions between transporter receptors and nuclear targeting signals within target cargo proteins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations101
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIUBMB LifeSame topicNuclear Structure and FunctionFrench-language works237,207