MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Experience With Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Eyelid and Conjunctival Malignancies at a Cancer Center

2004· article· en· W1981695494 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOphthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Oncology and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEyelidSentinel lymph nodeBiopsyGamma probeMelanomaLymphSurgerySebaceous carcinomaCancerSentinel nodeRadiologyPathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To describe one center's experience with sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in patients with eyelid and conjunctival malignancies performed with a smaller volume of technetium than was initially used and a small incision directly overlying the sentinel node(s). METHODS: A noncomparative interventional case series of 13 patients with clinically negative regional lymph nodes who underwent SLN biopsy for eyelid or conjunctival malignancies at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between May 2002 and July 2003. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy was performed with an injection of 0.3 mCi of technetium Tc-99m sulfur colloid in a volume of 0.2 mL. Images were taken as soon as the first SLN was detected through the gamma camera. Intraoperative mapping was performed with the same volume and concentration of technetium Tc-99m sulfur colloid along with an injection of isosulfan blue dye. RESULTS: Five patients had conjunctival melanoma, 6 had sebaceous cell carcinoma of the eyelid, and 2 had eyelid melanoma. SLN(s) were identified in all patients. In 12 patients, more than 1 SLN was identified. During surgery, no SLNs were blue. One patient with conjunctival melanoma had an SLN that was positive on histologic examination. There were no ocular or extraocular complications from the procedure except for mild temporary weakness of the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve in 2 patients that resolved completely within 4 to 6 weeks and without any further intervention. None of the patients had permanent blue tattooing of the conjunctival surface or eyelid skin. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience suggests that lymphoscintigraphy and SLN biopsy with a small volume of technetium Tc-99m sulfur colloid and small incisions, even without the use of the blue dye, can identify SLNs in patients with conjunctival and eyelid malignancies, and can be performed safely.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.576

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it