Fructose Feeding in the Suckling-Weaning Transition in Rats: Effects on Hyperlipidemia in Adulthood
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The sucking-weaning transition is characterized by high rates of growth and development and may be a sensitive period during which dietary intake could program metabolism to increase the risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes in adulthood. Intake of a high fructose (FR) diet is known to induce hypertriglyceridemia and insulin resistance in rats when they are consuming this diet. We examined whether a FR diet fed early in life produces detrimental changes in lipid and glucose metabolism that persist to adulthood. Weanling rats were fed 65% FR (wt/wt), a purified control diet (CNTL) or standard chow (CHOW) for 5 weeks. Beyond 9 weeks of age, all rats were fed CHOW. During FR feeding, plasma triglycerides (TG) were significantly elevated in the FR group (FR = 217 +/- 20; CNTL = 163 +/- 17; chow = 156 +/- 10). At 21 wks of age, TG's were similar in rats fed FR or CNTL versus CHOW at weaning (p > 0.87). Hepatic fatty acid synthase (FAS) activity was elevated in FR and CNTL groups vs. CHOW (65 +/- 7, 72 +/- 6 vs. 48 +/- 4 nmol NADPH/mg protein/min, p < 0.01). There were no differences in indices of glucose homeostasis at 21 weeks of age. Early exposure to a diet high in simple sugars (FR or CNTL) and/or low in fiber during the suckling-weaning transition may contribute to modest dyslipidemia later in life. Together, changes observed in this study may increase the risk of cardiovascular disease in adulthood.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".