MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981767629 · doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2006.11.016

Endothelial-like Vascular Progenitor Cells (VPCs) from Allogeneic and Autologous Donors: Mobilization Features Distinct from Hematopoietic Progenitors

2007· article· en· W1981767629 on OpenAlexafffund
David Allan, Pascale Dubé, Jean Roy, Lambert Busque, Denis‐Claude Roy

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAngiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontUniversity of Ottawa
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéAstellas Pharma
KeywordsMedicineProgenitor cellMobilizationHaematopoiesisCancer researchProgenitorStem cellImmunologyCell biologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Endothelial-like progenitor cells circulate in the peripheral blood (PB) and can be enumerated using cell culture-based progenitor assays. These circulating vascular progenitor cells (VPCs) are implicated in new vessel formation and regenerative potential in several animal and human models of tissue injury. Given the emerging role of VPCs in regenerative processes and the limited information on the availability of such progenitor cells, we sought to determine baseline circulating VPC levels in healthy allogeneic donors and autologous hematopoietic transplant patients. VPC numbers were also measured in peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts from both graft types. Immunohistochemistry revealed that VPC clusters obtained under our culture conditions were CD45(+) and acquired endothelial features (CD31 and vascular endothelial-cadherin) in vitro upon angiogenic stimulation and gradually lost monocytic surface markers (CD14). Before PBSC mobilization, VPCs levels varied substantially in healthy donors and were markedly lower in patients with hematologic malignancies compared with healthy allogeneic donors with 27 +/- 15 versus 99 +/- 21 VPCs/mL (mean +/- SEM), respectively (P = .001). In patients undergoing stem cell mobilization, VPCs in the PB increased from 7 +/- 2 on day 0 to 51 +/- 9 by day 7 of mobilization (P = .05), representing a median fold increase of 8.9 (range, 3.0-29.8). Although autologous transplant patients underwent more intensive mobilization, VPCs were higher in allogeneic (7.2 +/- 1.4 x 10(3)/kg) than in autologous (2.6 +/- 1.5 x 10(3)/kg) mobilized PB grafts (P = .045). To identify predictors of VPC content, graft VPCs were compared with levels of CD34(+) cells, total colony forming unit (CFU), or granulocyte-macrophage colony forming unit (GM-CFU). None of these hematopoietic progenitors correlated with VPC numbers in PBSC grafts (P = NS). However, PB monocyte levels were highly correlated with circulating VPC levels (r = 0.71, P < .0001). Thus, our analysis identified significant variability in VPCs at baseline and in PBSC grafts from healthy donors. Nevertheless, these donors remain a better source of VPCs than do autologous transplant patients. Importantly, VPC mobilization occurs independently of hematopoietic mobilization. In view of the potential role of VPCs in recovery from transplant-related tissue injury, angiogenic mobilization strategies that complement hematopoietic mobilization will need to be specifically designed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.727

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of Blood and Marrow TransplantationSame topicAngiogenesis and VEGF in CancerFrench-language works237,207