MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981773217 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2014.2351837

Toward Optimal Admission Control and Resource Allocation for LTE-A Femtocell Uplink

2014· article· en· W1981773217 on OpenAlexaff
Xudong Xiang, Chuang Lin, Xin Chen, Xuemin Shen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Network Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFemtocellComputer scienceTelecommunications linkComputer networkScheduling (production processes)Throughput3rd Generation Partnership Project 2Resource allocationBase stationGreedy algorithmHeuristicUser equipmentQuality of serviceAdmission controlMarkov decision processMathematical optimizationMarkov processWirelessAlgorithmTelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Third-Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) has incorporated femtocell (FC) technology in the Long-Term Evolution Advanced (LTE-A) standard to enhance the quality of service of indoor mobile users and extend the coverage area of existing macrocells (MCs). In such two-tier LTE-A MC/FC systems, cotier and cross-tier interference exists in cochannel deployment, exerting adverse effects on system performance. In this paper, we study the single-carrier frequency-division multiple-access (SC-FDMA)-based LTE-A FC uplink. We propose the use of transport-layer data admission control (AC) in femto user equipment (FUE) and interference-aware resource allocation (RA) in each base station (BS) to manage the intercell interference (ICI). We first formulate the problem as a constrained Markov decision problem (CMDP) that aims at maximizing the time-average throughput of the entire FC tier subject to the queue stability constraint for each FUE. Then, we propose a joint AC and RA (JACRA) algorithm to obtain the optimal AC and RA policies. In light of the NP-hardness of the RA subproblem, we further propose an iterative heuristic with polynomial time complexity. Simulation studies show that the proposed JACRA algorithm is throughput optimal, outperforming alternative proportional fair (PF) and round robin (RR) scheduling schemes. Moreover, the proposed heuristic achieves near-optimal throughput with substantial improvement in computational complexity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicAdvanced Wireless Network OptimizationFrench-language works237,207