Jiufeng Protected Area Biodiversity Threats Assessment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Located in the East of Wuhan City, Jiufeng Protected area is endowed with a rich biodiversity in diversitylandscape (Metasequoia forests, forest ponds, pine forest, Wetland pine, fir, cedar forest, Liquidambar forests,oak forests massoniana and lobular, Lin and mushroom). The objectives of this study were to assess andunderstand the biodiversity threats, evaluate activities, help prioritize and anticipate what threats might becomemore severe in the future. Threat assessment was based on a review of peer articles and secondary data sourcessuch as key informant interviews. Interviews with local and provincial authorities and visits in the field were heldto gather information on Jiufeng protected area resources and biodiversity threats. This research was carried out onJune 2009. The Interviews, the literature review and field report showed that the biodiversity is threatened by avariety of human activities and natural factors such as climate change and invasive alien species. These threatscan cause the biodiversity loss. In Jiufeng Protected Area, human activities such as land use and land coverchange, industrialization and pollution, tourism and recreation constitute threats for biodiversity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it