Amine‐functionalization of the nanotitanate ETS‐2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of nonporous, amine‐functionalized sodium titanates was prepared and the thermal and adsorptive behavior of the samples were characterized. Engelhard titanosilicate 2 was chosen as a substrate for its high surface area (∼300 m2/g), native surface hydroxyl concentration, and lack of microporosity; eliminating the risk of fouling the adsorbent under certain process conditions. Aminosilanes containing a single (N1), two (N2), and three (N3) amine groups were chemically grafted to the surface of the substrate and the adsorption capacity for CO2 measured through thermogravimetry‐mass spectroscopy (TG‐MS) desorption, volumetric adsorption, and gravimetric adsorption/desorption cycling. The N3 sample displayed complete monolayer coverage and was capable of adsorbing five times as much atmospheric CO2 as the N1 sample. Testing under anhydrous conditions only engages the primary amine on the tether and the data consistently suggests a correlation between amine utilization and the proportion of monolayer coverage for these adsorbents. © 2013 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 59: 4727–4734, 2013
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".