MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981809104 · doi:10.1021/ac303772m

Fluorescence Quenching of Graphene Oxide Integrating with the Site-Specific Cleavage of the Endonuclease for Sensitive and Selective MicroRNA Detection

2013· article· en· W1981809104 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yunqiu Tu, Wen Li, Ping Wu, Hui Zhang, Chenxin Cai

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Chemistry · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPublic Health Agency of Canada
KeywordsChemistryGrapheneCleavage (geology)FluorescenceEndonucleasemicroRNAQuenching (fluorescence)OxideNanotechnologyPhotochemistryBiophysicsDNABiochemistryGeneOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A considerable effort is currently focused on identifying microRNA (miRNA) biomarkers because they could serve for early disease diagnosis as well as for assessing the prognosis and monitoring the response to treatment. The efficient use of the biomarkers requires precise analysis of miRNAs. This work reports a rapid, sensitive, and selective miRNA assay by coupling the fluorescence quenching of graphene oxide (GO) with site-specific cleavage of an endonuclease. The method is developed by designing a single-stranded probe that carries both a binding region responsible for facilitating the interaction with GO, which induces fluorescence quenching of the 5'-terminus-labeled fluorophore (FAM, 6-carboxyfluorescein), and a sensing region for specifically recognizing the target and hybridizing with it to form a duplex. The duplex is released from the GO surface through cleavage of RsaI endonuclease, resulting in fluorescence recovery, which shows a trend in the target concentration. The assay can detect down to ∼3.0 fM miR-126 with a linear range of 4 orders of magnitude and has an ability to discriminate the target sequence from even single-base mismatched sequence or other miRNA sequences. Moreover, it can also be used for estimating the miR-126 expressions in cells. The advantage of this assay is that it operates via the detection of the recovered fluorescence signal, which is a combined result of the specific hybridization and the site-specific cleavage, and thus should be impervious to false signals arising due to the nonspecific adsorption of interferants. It could be a great potential tool for selective analysis of miRNAs in cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.264

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations71
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytical ChemistrySame topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesFrench-language works237,207