A New Fixed-Dose Combination for Added Blood Pressure Control: Telmisartan Plus Hydrochlorothiazide
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Population surveys on hypertension management reveal worrying deficiencies in the awareness and treatment of high blood pressure. Many patients with hypertension will require two or more drugs with complementary mechanisms of action (which generally have additive effects, producing greater blood pressure reductions than either agent alone) to attain the blood pressure goals specified in internationally accepted guidelines. Nevertheless, physicians are often reluctant to prescribe multiple anti-hypertensive drugs due to concerns over side-effects, inconvenient dosing regimens and costs. Fixed-dose formulations combining two agents from different classes in a single tablet should help to allay these concerns. A fixed-dose combination containing telmisartan (an angiotensin II receptor blocker) and hydrochlorothiazide (a thiazide diuretic) has recently been developed. Telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide provides additional anti-hypertensive efficacy compared with the respective monotherapies in a wide range of patients, including black patients, requires once-daily dosing, is cost-effective, well tolerated and is associated with less potassium depletion than hydrochlorothiazide administered alone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".