Nonweight-related body image concerns among female eating-disordered patients and nonclinical controls: Some preliminary observations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Eating disorders(ED) have been classically associated with a concern about body shape and size that manifests mainly as an intense fear of weight gain (DSM-IV criteria). To further examine the nature of the body image disturbance in ED, we surveyed the prevalence of nonweight-related body image concerns among ED patients and nonclinical controls. METHOD: We examined 53 women (M +/- SD age: 28.1 +/- 6.8 years) with anorexia nervosa and/or bulimia nervosa (DSM-III-R criteria) and 73 randomly selected nonclinical women (M +/- SD age: 30.2 +/- 6.6 years) from the community. The participants rated (by checking a "Yes" or "No") whether they were satisfied with the appearance of the following body regions: their skin, teeth, jaw, nose, eyes, ears, hair, and height and completed the Drive for Thinness (DT) and Body Dissatisfaction (BD) subscales of the Eating Disorders Inventory (EDI). RESULTS: The frequencies of dissatisfaction with the appearance of various physical attributes among the ED patients versus the nonclinical controls were as follows: skin: 79.2% vs. 52.1%, p =.002; teeth: 62.3% vs. 39.7%, p =. 012; jaw: 24.5% vs. 9.7%, p =.026; nose: 45.3% vs. 24.7%, p =.015; eyes: 22.6% vs. 12.3%, p =.12; ears: 20.8% vs. 2.7%, p =.001; hair: 52.8% vs. 39.7%, p =.14; and height: 28.3% vs. 13.7%, p =.04. As expected, the M +/- SD DT (EDI): 14.0 +/- 6.1 vs.3.5 +/- 4.6, p <. 0001 and the M +/- SD BD (EDI): 19.7 +/- 5.8 vs. 10.1 +/- 7.3, p <. 0001, were both higher in the ED group. Furthermore, greater dissatisfaction with nonweight-related body image was associated with higher DT and BD scores. CONCLUSION: The higher prevalence of dissatisfaction with appearance of most of the nonweight-related physical attributes is probably an indication of the core ego deficits that are often present in ED and an index of the severity of the overall body image disturbance in these patients, and not indicative of another condition (e.g., body dysmorphic disorder) as the current nosology (DSM-IV) suggests.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".