Part I. Embryonic surgery using femtosecond laser pulses for the delivery of exogenous materials and the analysis of gene expression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Herein, we demonstrate the application of high-intensity femtosecond (fs) laser pulses for performing laser surgery on the embryonic cells of developing zebrafish (Danio rerio). When fs laser pulses were focused onto individual blastomeres, transient pores were formed exposing the extracellular space to the intracellular environment. Utilizing the transient pores as a pathway for delivery of exogenous material, both chorionated and dechorionated zebrafish embryos were successfully loaded with a fluorescent reporter molecule (fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)). Streptavidin-conjugated quantum dots or plasmid DNA (Simian-CMV-EGFP). Both FITC and quantum dots were found to disperse throughout the blastomere cells as the embryo developed. Gene expression was seen in 24 hour post-fertilized embryos, with fluorescence observed in the notochord, floor plates, somites and tails of the larvae. We also determined the survivability of laser-manipulated embryos by rearing zebrafish from early to mid cleavage stage (2-cell to 8/16-cell) to pec-fin stage. Survival rates of 89 and 100 % were found for dechorionated and chorionated embryos, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".