<title>Corrected GPR velocity and attenuation tomography of artifacts due to media anisotropy, borehole trajectory error, and instrumental drifts</title>
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using standard inversion algorithm, velocity and attenuation tomograms can show artifacts which compromise interpretation. These artifacts can be due to errors in borehole trajectory measurements, medium anisotropy, T<SUB>0</SUB> (initial time) or A<SUB>0</SUB> (initial amplitude) drifts. In order to cancel these artifacts, the error sources can be introduced as unknown parameters in inversion algorithms (Hollender, 1999). In this paper, we present results obtained with crosshole radar data, recorded in a limestone quarry. Using the appropriate algorithms, all the artifacts have been cancelled and tomograms show clearly subhorizontal structures in agreement with the quarry stratification. In our data set, results do not reveal significant trajectory error, and T<SUB>0</SUB> and A<SUB>0</SUB> drifts are low. However, the presence of a velocity and attenuation anisotropy appears clearly on the tomograms. In the case of attenuation tomograms, the high anisotropy rates could be explained by the cumulative effect of the partitioning of energy due to reflection and transmission mechanisms at interfaces, and medium anisotropy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it