MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981984099 · doi:10.1255/ejms.572

Characterisation of the Intact Rainbow Trout Vitellogenin Protein and Analysis of its Derived Tryptic and Cyanogen Bromide Peptides by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionisation Time-of-Flight-Mass Spectrometry and Electrospray Ionisation Quadrupole/Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry

2003· article· en· W1981984099 on OpenAlexaff
Joseph Banoub, Pierre Thibault, Atef Mansour, Alejandro Cohen, David H. Heeley, Donna M. Jackman

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Mass Spectrometry · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans CanadaCaprion (Canada)Memorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCyanogen bromideChemistryVitellogeninMass spectrometryChromatographyRainbow troutElectrosprayProtein mass spectrometryMatrix gla proteinMatrix-assisted laser desorption/ionizationElectrospray ionizationBiochemistryPeptide sequenceDesorptionBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vitellogenin (VTG) is a protein produced by the liver of oviparous animals. It is being used as a biomarker for exposure to endocrine disruptors in many species. Rainbow trout Vtg has recently been sequenced by the conventional cDNA nucleotide approach. We focused on protein characterization of the intact protein and its derived tryptic and cyanogen bromide peptides by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation and electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry. The molecular mass of the intact protein was found to be 183127 Da. A large number of unidentified peptide ions encourage further structural analysis to propose possible sequence variants and post-translational modifications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Mass SpectrometrySame topicMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207