Morphological and genetic differentiation in anadromous smelt <i>Osmerus mordax</i> (Mitchill): disentangling the effects of geography and morphology on gene flow
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Morphological analyses were combined with genetic analyses at nine microsatellite loci to examine the determinants of gene flow at 21 spawning locations of rainbow smelt Osmerus mordax along the east coast of Canada. Associations between morphology, geography and gene flow were examined using a computational geometric approach and partial Mantel tests. Significant barriers to gene flow and discontinuities in morphology were observed between Newfoundland and mainland Canada, as well as within Newfoundland samples. On regional scales, contrasting patterns were present with restricted gene flow between Newfoundland populations ( F ST = c . 0·11) and high gene flow between mainland populations ( F ST = c . 0·017). Within Newfoundland populations, geographic distance was significantly associated with gene flow ( r = 0·85, P < 0·001) contrasting mainland samples where gene flow was most associated with phenotypic divergence ( r = 0·33, P < 0·001). At large spatial scales, weak ( r = 0·19, P = 0·02) associations between gene flow and geographic distance were observed, and moderate associations were also observed between gene flow and morphology ( r = 0·28, P < 0·001). The presence of significant genetic isolation by distance in Newfoundland samples and the clear discontinuity associated with the Cabot Strait suggest geography may be the primary determinant of gene flow. Interestingly, the association between genetic and morphological divergence within mainland samples and overall, supports the hypothesis that gene flow may be moderated by morphological divergence at larger spatial scales even in high gene flow environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".