Late Spinal Cord Compression Caused by Pulled-out Thoracic Pedicle Screws: A Case Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Brief Study Design. A case report. Objectives. To report a late neurologic compromise caused by pulling-out of thoracic pedicle screws. Summary of Background Data. Although screw misplacement is quite common, only few neurologic injuries have been reported because of penetration of the medial wall of pedicles in the thoracic spine. To our knowledge, neurologic compromise caused by pulling-out of the screws has not been reported to date. Methods. A 6-year-old girl with congenital muscle fiber type disproportion was posteriorly instrumented (T3 to L4) for severe kyphosis. Later, she had a junctional kyphosis over the top of the instrument. Her instrumentation was lengthened to T2 by using transpedicular screws. During the follow-up period, T2 screws were pulled-out and intruded into the canal, causing neurologic compromise. The presenting symptoms, imaging studies, and related literature are reviewed in this report. Results. Patient’s neurologic symptoms subsided after removal of the pedicle screws intruded into the spinal canal. Conclusions. Pulling-out of transpedicular screws inserted at T1 or T2 where the pedicles are oriented more medially may cause late neurologic compromise caused by intrusion of triangulated screws into the spinal canal. A 6-year-old girl with congenital muscle fiber type disproportion was instrumented posteriorly (T3 to L4) for severe kyphosis. Later she had a junctional kyphosis over the top of the instrument. Her instrumentation was lengthened to T2 by using pedicle screws. During the follow-up period T2 screws were pulled out and intruded into the canal, compressing the spinal cord and causing neurological compromise. The neurological symptoms subsided immediately after the removal of the screws.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".