MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

TEMPORAL LOBE SURGERY FOR INTRACTABLE EPILEPSY IN CHILDREN

2006· article· en· W1982041136 on OpenAlexaff
Mony Benifla, Hiroshi Otsubo, Ayako Ochi, Shelly K. Weiss, Elizabeth Donner, Manohar Shroff, Sylvester H. Chuang, Cynthia Hawkins, James M. Drake, Irene Elliott, Mary Lou Smith, O. Carter Snead, James T. Rutka

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurosurgery · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTemporal lobeCortical dysplasiaEpilepsyGangliogliomaSurgeryMagnetic resonance imagingEpilepsy surgeryEpilepsy in childrenAnterior temporal lobectomyRetrospective cohort studyRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Temporal lobectomy is a well-established neurosurgical procedure for temporal lobe epilepsy. In this study, we conducted a retrospective review of children with drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy to evaluate seizure outcome after temporal lobe surgery. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 126 children who had surgery for temporal lobe epilepsy at The Hospital for Sick Children between 1983 and 2003. The records were examined for preoperative and intraoperative factors that could predict patient outcome after surgery. RESULTS: The mean age at seizure onset was 5.9 years. The mean seizure duration before surgery was 5.6 years. All patients had preoperative computed tomographic scans, magnetic resonance imaging scans, or both. The mean age at the time of surgery was 13.5 years. Sixty-two patients underwent left temporal resections and 64 patients underwent right temporal resections. The histopathology of the temporal resections revealed low-grade brain tumors in 65 children (52%) and cavernous malformations in four children. Ganglioglioma and astrocytoma were the most common tumors encountered. Mesial temporal sclerosis was found in 16 patients (13%), astrogliosis in 15 patients (12%), and cortical dysplasia in eight patients (7%). Postoperative follow-up of at least 2 years was available for 106 patients and ranged up to 13.0 years. Seventy-four percent of patients had an Engel Class I or II outcome. Patients with temporal lobe lesions had better outcomes compared with those without lesions (P < 0.05). Patients without a history of secondary generalization of seizures also had a better outcome when compared with those with secondary generalization. Complications in the form of contralateral homonymous hemianopsia, dysphasia, and infection were found in 5% of patients. Twelve patients had a second temporal lobe procedure for intractable recurrent seizures. After a second procedure, seven patients returned to a seizure-free state. CONCLUSION: Temporal lobe resections for epilepsy in children are effective and safe procedures, with a favorable impact on seizure control. Repeat temporal resections for recurrent seizures may also be effective in restoring a seizure-free outcome to children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations142
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurosurgerySame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207