MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982041156 · doi:10.1139/v01-204

The first observed complex of 11-crown-3 ether. X-ray crystal structure and NMR study of (benzo-11-crown-3)<sub>2</sub>·LiNCS

2002· article· en· W1982041156 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
G. W. Buchanan, Mastaneh Azad, Glenn P. A. Yap

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMolecular Sensors and Ion Detection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryCrown etherCrystallographyCrystal structureNMR spectra databaseMonoclinic crystal systemRelaxation (psychology)DimerSolid-state nuclear magnetic resonanceStereochemistrySpectral lineNuclear magnetic resonanceIonOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The title complex crystallizes in the monoclinic P21/c space group, with a = 7.7397(8), b = 18.287(2), c = 17.4726(19) Å, β = 94.008(2)°, and Z = 4. The coordination geometry around the lithium cation is pseudooctahedral. The effects of lithium complexation on the 1H and 13C solution NMR spectra are discussed. In the solid-state 13C NMR spectrum at 300 K, very long aliphatic proton spin lattice relaxation times are observed along with broadening of the aliphatic carbon resonances. These results are attributed to the dipolar washout phenomenon, where the presence of a low amplitude motion of the same frequency as the 1H decoupler, leads to less effective removal of the 1H–13C dipolar coupling. At 330 K, there is some sharpening of the aliphatic resonances since there is less interference between the motion and the decoupling frequency.Key words: crown ether analog, lithium complex.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicMolecular Sensors and Ion DetectionFrench-language works237,207