MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982060613 · doi:10.2514/6.2007-5197

PPS®1350 Qualification Demonstration: 10500 hrs on the Ground and 5000 hrs in Flight

2007· article· en· W1982060613 on OpenAlexaff
Nicolas Cornu, Frédéric Marchandise, Franck Darnon, Denis Estublier

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft Design and Technology
Canadian institutionsSafran Electronics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The PPS ® 1350-G is a thruste r d esigne d for North/South station keeping of satellites in the range 1 to 4 tons in Geostationary Earth Orbit (1.7 t to 6.5 t in GTO). The PPS®1350-G produces a nominal thrust of 88 10 -3 N for an electrical input power of 1,5 kW. On th e Smart-1 lunar mission (launch mass of 370 kg), a thruster of identical design has demonstrated almost 5000 hrs of ope rations in flight with a thrust of 70 10 -3 N for an available input power level of 1.2 kW. This pape r discusses the current qualification status of the PPS ® 1350-G. Th e qualification campaign starte d in 2002 with environmental tests. The camp aign then proceeded with life testing, and is still on going at th e Sn ecma test facilities. A first sequence of on/off cycles was completed, before a set of cold-cycle conditions in Russia, at OKB Fakel facilities. A second sequence of cold cycles were per formed at the beginning of 2006, to de monstrate the ab ility of the thruste r to operate in very cold conditions at the end of its operational life. These cold starts whe re performe d within a dedicated Snecma test facility at temperatures below -45°C. The thruster performance remaine d nominal after these tests. Since the end of these cold-start cycles, in the middle of 2006, life testing has resume d and is still on-going with the objective of de monstrating the capability required for the Alphabus platform. The objective in terms of on /off cycles was met in mid -Septe mber 2006, with over 7250 cycles; life testing is thus now proceeding with long firings, typically of 250 hours, in order to cover the total impulse needs for orbit toping. End of Dece mber 2006, over 10500 hrs of cumulate d run time and 3.39 10 6 N.s of total impulse have been demonstrate d by the Qualification Model (QM). Results show good thruster pe rformance, above the specified values. This paper will discuss the thruster performance in terms of eff iciency, thrust stability, thermal behavior and ion distribution (data measured along the life test). Thermal cartography of the thruster also provides information on the phenomena occurring during the e ngine startup transient. As already obse rved in flight as well as on most development tests, this thruster shows similar functional transition modes. Erosion of th e thruster and cathode is still occurring at a relatively slow pace, with special mention to the cathode exhibiting quite very little visible (external) erosion. Additionally, the diffe rent tests performe d on the PPS ® 1350-G thruster indicate an excellent availability and reliability. The diffe rent components reliability (cathode, anode block, xenon flow controller) will be discussed. With the use of Electric Propulsion, the issue

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpacecraft Design and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207