Effectiveness, Specificity and Safety of Intranasal l-Deamino-8-D-Arginine Vasopressin Treatment of Normal Blood Donors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A study of the absorption of 300 micrograms of 1-deamino-8-D-arginine vasopressin (DDAVP) given intranasally to normal blood donors was carried out to determine (a) the correlation between plasma levels of DDAVP and the percent rise of factor VIII procoagulant activity (VIII:C) and (b) the efficacy, specificity and safety of this treatment in increasing the recovery of factor VIII:C in donated blood. The maximum drug concentration was highly correlated to the maximum percent rise of VIII:C (r = 0.858, p less than 0.01). A differentiated effect of DDAVP on increases of VIII:C, VIII:Ag, vWF:Ag and vWF multimers was observed. A transient rise of fibrinopeptide A from 5 to 16 ng/ml, 30 min post-DDAVP, was not accompanied by changes in fibrinogen levels or generation of detectable factor Xa or thrombin. DDAVP had no effect on the factor XII-dependent pathway of plasminogen activation, or on the donor's vital signs and hematological parameters. Side effects were minor and of short duration. Intranasal DDAVP treatment of blood donors is considered to be a practical means of improving the recovery of VIII:C from normal donors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".