Identification and proposal of a potentially new clonal complex that is a common cause of MenB disease in central and eastern Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examined serogroup B meningococci (MenB) from invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) cases in the provinces of Québec and Ontario in the last decade by multilocus sequence typing (MLST) to determine their sequence types (STs) and clonal complexes (CCs). Forty isolates from individual MenB IMD cases were found to belong to 8 related STs, with ST-336 being the founding ST and the other 7 STs being single locus variants of ST-336. Eleven isolates belonged to ST-336, 23 belonged to ST-5571, and the other 6 were represented individually by a single different ST. All but 1 of these 40 isolates have the PorA variable-region type of P1.22,14,36. Interrogation of the Neisseria MLST web site with the present finding did not put any of the 8 related STs into known CCs. Since these 8 related STs were common causes of IMD, with ST-5571 being the most frequently identified ST in Ontario and ST-336 the third most common ST identified in Québec, we propose that ST-336 and its related STs is a potentially new meningococcal clonal complex that is endemic in the Canadian provinces of Québec and Ontario, and they constitute a common cause of IMD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".